Earlier this month, Kathleen gave a presentation to Austin Wharton School alumni on proactive brand management strategies that CEOs need to adopt in 2020. Among those strategies was social activism and the role brands play in it today.
Over the last several weeks, we’ve seen a reckoning finally arrive for a number of noteworthy b(r)ands from the Dixie Chicks, Lady Antebellum, Aunt Jemima, Uncle Ben’s and Land O’ Lakes to various sports teams like the Washington NFL franchise and the Cleveland MLB franchise.
Some brands have been quicker than others to respond to growing demand for change. The Washington Football Team—currently embroiled in a major scandal that alleges systemic sexual harassment against its female employees and beat reporters—has actively resisted calls for a rebrand for decades. Owner Dan Snyder has used words like “history,” “pride,” “honor” and “respect” to defend his decision in the past. It was only until major sponsors like FedEx threatened to dissolve their partnership that Snyder relented and announced a name change earlier this month.
While this is just one particularly egregious example, it highlights a critical oversight in reputation management that’s worth discussing: Tradition can’t and shouldn’t come at the expense of one’s legacy, and short-term gain can’t and shouldn’t supersede long-term brand health and reputation.
To many brands that have been around for a long time, the idea of tradition is inevitably tied to short-term gains. For the Washington franchise, that meant commodities like merchandise, recurring season ticket revenues and a general unwillingness to undertake a rebranding exercise it clearly viewed as more of a hassle than an opportunity. In these types of scenarios, what’s clearly lacking is a more long-term vision. Tradition is built on the past, but legacy—a concept that emphasizes values over valuables—is built on the present and forged in the future. When these two ideas are at odds, legacy should win out every time.
Also missing from this equation for some brands is the acknowledgement that rebranding doesn’t have to be a bad thing. It can be an opportunity to modernize, to find new audiences, to re-establish relevance with a new message that resonates with today’s customer segments, and ultimately to boost the bottom line.
The rise in brand activism is teaching us that the past can’t be the only factor that drives a decision. You’re guaranteed to get burned. And while it might never be too late to do the right thing, it comes at a cost the longer one waits.